[Repoze-dev] "Friends and Family" release process

Chris McDonough chrism at plope.com
Wed Sep 26 20:53:07 UTC 2007


On Sep 26, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Paul Everitt wrote:

> Well, I understand the need to file off the sharp edges.  But the  
> resulting index.stx is pretty damn general, at least to me.  I can  
> live with it, but it comes out sounding like "We do a whole lot of  
> stuff."

Did you read the bits about 'repoze.packageindex' and  
'repoze.deploy'?  These are descriptions of packages that meet the  
"new world order" goals.

> Since I'm not coding it, I'm not the one to make choices.  Just  
> commenting that, as a semi-outsider, there doesn't seem to be much  
> of a there there in the story now that "Zope" is gone and "deploy"  
> expanded into "package and deploy".

That's useful feedback.  I think the branding trick here is to  
decompose the bits that make up "Repoze" into categories.  It's  
probably going to be bewildering if we suggest that people think of  
it as one thing (just as it's unhelpful to think of "Paste" as one  
thing; it's actually PasteScript, PasteDeploy, and PasteMiddleware).   
We might need two names, or three, or five, or ten.  That doesn't  
mean that it can't be RepozeDeploy, RepozeMiddleware, etc., just to  
establish a single brand.

- C




More information about the Repoze-dev mailing list